The California JV 462 form is a legal document used in court proceedings to assess the status of nonminor dependents placed in short-term residential therapeutic programs. This form helps the court evaluate the appropriateness of the current placement and the ongoing needs of the nonminor. If you need to fill out this form, please click the button below.
The California JV 462 form plays a crucial role in the judicial process concerning nonminor dependents placed in short-term residential therapeutic programs. This form is used during status review hearings to assess the ongoing necessity and appropriateness of a nonminor's placement. It allows the court to consider various factors, such as whether the current placement is suitable and whether the nonminor has made progress toward independence. The form requires input from multiple parties, including the nonminor dependent, probation officers, and county agency social workers, ensuring a collaborative approach to decision-making. Key findings include evaluations of the nonminor's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan, which outlines the steps necessary for achieving successful adulthood. The court also reviews the efforts made by the county agency to support the nonminor in meeting these goals. Ultimately, the JV 462 form serves as a comprehensive tool for the court to determine the best path forward for nonminor dependents, balancing their needs with the legal framework established by the Welfare and Institutions Code.
JV-462
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
STATE BAR NO.:
FOR COURT USE ONLY
NAME:
FIRM NAME:
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP CODE:
TELEPHONE NO.:
FAX NO.:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ATTORNEY FOR (name):
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME:
NONMINOR'S NAME:
NONMINOR'S DATE OF BIRTH:
HEARING DATE AND TIME:
FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER NONMINOR DEPENDENT
CASE NUMBER:
STATUS REVIEW HEARING
Judicial Officer:
Court Clerk:
Court Reporter:
Bailiff:
Other Court Personnel:
Interpreter:
Language:
1. Parties (name):
Present
Attorney (name):
a.
Nonminor dependent:
b.
Probation officer:
c. County agency social worker:
d.
Other (specify):
2.Tribal representative (name):
3.Others present in courtroom
a.Other (specify):
b.Other (specify):
c.Other (specify):
d.Other (specify):
4.The court has read, and considered, and admits into evidence:
a. Report of social worker dated:
Report of probation officer dated:
c. Other (specify):
d. Other (specify):
BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND ON ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS:
5. Notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing was given as required by law. 6. 7. 8. 9.
10.
Page 1 of 4
Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-462 [Rev. October 1, 2021]
Welfare & Institutions Code, §§ 224.1(b), 245, 366.1, 366.3, 366.31; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.903
www.courts.ca.gov
11.
c.
e.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
The nonminor dependent's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan does include a plan for him or her to satisfy at least one of the criteria in Welfare and Institutions Code section 11403(b) to remain in foster care under juvenile court jurisdiction as indicated below:
Attending high school or a high school equivalency certificate (GED) program.
Attending a college, a community college, or a vocational education program.
Attending a program or participating in an activity that will promote or help remove a barrier to employment.
Employed at least 80 hours per month.
The nonminor dependent is not able to attend a high school, a high school equivalency certificate (GED) program, a college, a community college, a vocational education program, or an employment program or activity or to work 80 hours per month due to a medical condition.
The county agency
has
has not
made reasonable efforts and provided assistance to help the nonminor
dependent establish and maintain compliance with one of the conditions in Welfare and Institutions Code section 11403(b).
The nonminor dependent
was
was not
provided with the information, documents, and services as
required under Welfare and Institutions Code section 391(c).
The Transitional Independent Living Case Plan
developed jointly by the nonminor
dependent and the county agency.
For the nonminor dependent who has elected to have the Indian Child Welfare Act continue to apply, the representative from
his or her tribe was was not consulted during the development of the nonminor dependent's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan.
The nonminor dependent's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan
does
does not
reflect the living
situation and services consistent, in the nonminor dependent's opinion, with what he or she needs to achieve successful adulthood and set out benchmarks that indicate how both the county agency and nonminor dependent will know when successful adulthood can be achieved.
17.
18.
include appropriate
and meaningful independent living skill services that will help the youth transition from foster care to successful adulthood.
made reasonable efforts to comply with the nonminor dependent's
Transitional Independent Living Case Plan, including efforts to finalize the youth's permanent plan and prepare him or her for independence.
19.
20.
The nonminor dependent Living Case Plan.
did
made ongoing and intensive efforts to finalize the permanent plan.
did not
sign and receive a copy of his or her Transitional Independent
21.a.
22.
The extent of progress made by the nonminor dependent toward meeting the Transitional Independent Living Case Plan goals
has been
excellent
satisfactory
minimal.
The modifications to the Transitional Independent Living Case Plan goals needed to assist the nonminor dependent in his or her efforts to attain those goals were stated on the record.
exercised due diligence to locate an appropriate relative with whom the
nonminor could be placed. Each relative whose name has been submitted to the department
been evaluated.
23.
24.
made reasonable efforts to maintain relations between the nonminor
dependent and individuals who are important to him or her, including efforts to establish and maintain relationships with caring and committed adults who can serve as lifelong connections.
has not made reasonable efforts to establish or maintain the nonminor
dependent's relationship with his or her siblings who are under juvenile court jurisdiction.
25. The likely date by which it is anticipated the nonminor dependent will achieve successful adulthood is:
26.
It appears that juvenile court jurisdiction over the nonminor may no longer be necessary, and a hearing to consider termination of juvenile court jurisdiction under rule 5.555 of the California Rules of Court is ordered.
JV-462 [Rev. October 1, 2021]
FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER NONMINOR DEPENDENT STATUS REVIEW HEARING
Page 2 of 4
27.
28.
At a hearing under rule 5.555 of the California Rules of Court held on the date below, the juvenile court entered the findings and orders as recorded on the Findings and Orders After Hearing to Consider Termination of Juvenile Court Jurisdiction Over a Nonminor (form JV-367), and juvenile court jurisdiction is terminated under those findings and orders.
Juvenile court jurisdiction over the youth as a nonminor dependent is continued and
The youth's permanent plan is:
(1)
Return home
(2)
Adoption
(3)
Tribal customary adoption
(4)
Placement with a fit and willing relative
(5)
Another planned permanent living arrangement
(6) Other (specify):
For nonminors placed in another planned permanent living arrangement, the court has considered the evidence
before it and finds that another planned permanent living arrangement is still the best permanent plan because:
The nonminor is 18 or older.
The compelling reasons why other permanent plan options are not in the nonminor's best interest are:
The nonminor wants to live independently.
Family reunification services are continued.
d.The matter is continued for a hearing set under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.31, and rule 5.903 of the California Rules of Court within the next six months.
29.All prior orders not in conflict with this order remain in full force and effect.
30.
Other findings and orders
See attachment 29a.
(Specify):
31.
Additional findings and orders for nonminor dependent with case plan of continued family reunification services
a. The agency
complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to create a safe home
for the nonminor dependent to reside in and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent plan.
b.The extent of progress made toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating the current out-of-home placement has been
by the father:
by the mother:
by the nonminor:
other (specify):
c. The likely date by which the nonminor dependent may safely reside in the family home or achieve successful adulthood is:
d. (1)
(a)
(b)
The nonminor can safely reside in the family home and may return to the family home.
The court maintains jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 303(a) and a review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.31 is ordered.
It appears that juvenile court jurisdiction over the nonminor may no longer be necessary, and a hearing to consider termination of juvenile court jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 391 and rule 5.555 of the California Rules of Court is ordered.
Page 3 of 4
31. d. (2)
The nonminor cannot safely reside in the family home, and reunification services are continued.
(a)The nonminor dependent and parent(s) of guardian(s) are in agreement with the continuation of reunification services.
(b)Continued reunification services are in the best interest of the nonminor dependent.
(c)There is a substantial probability that the nonminor dependent will be able to safely reside in the family home by the next review hearing.
(d)The matter is continued for a review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.31 and rule 5.903 of the California Rules of Court within the next six months.
The nonminor cannot safely reside in the family home and reunification services are terminated (check all that apply).
(a) The nonminor dependent and parent(s) or guardian(s) are not in agreement with the continuation of reunification services.
(c)
Continued reunification services are not in the best interest of the nonminor dependent.
There is not a substantial probability that the nonminor dependent will be able to safely reside in the family home by the next review hearing.
32.
Additional findings and orders for nonminor residing in the home of a parent or former legal guardian
(1) It appears that juvenile court jurisdiction over the nonminor may no longer be necessary, and a hearing to consider termination of juvenile court jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 391 and rule 5.555 of the California Rules of Court is ordered.
(2) Court supervision and juvenile court jurisdiction continues to be necessary. The court maintains jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 303(a). The matter is continued for a review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.31 and rule 5.903 of the California Rules of Court within the next six months.
complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to
maintain a safe family home for the nonminor.
complied with the nonminor's Transitional Independent Living Case
Plan, including efforts to prepare the nonminor for successful adulthood.
33.The next hearings are scheduled as follows:
Nonminor dependent status review hearing (Wel. & Inst. Code, § 366.31; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.903)
Hearing date:
Time:
Dept:
Room:
Hearing to consider termination of jurisdiction under rule 5.555 of the California Rules of Court.
34.Number of pages attached:
Date:
JUDICIAL OFFICER
FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER NONMINOR
DEPENDENT STATUS REVIEW HEARING
For your protection and privacy, please press the Clear
This Form button after you have printed the form.
Print this form
Save this form
Page 4 of 4
Clear this form
Completing the California JV-462 form requires careful attention to detail. After filling out the form, it will be submitted to the court for review. Be sure to keep a copy for your records. Follow these steps to ensure that you accurately complete the form.
What is the purpose of the California JV-462 form?
The California JV-462 form is used during a status review hearing for nonminor dependents placed in short-term residential therapeutic programs. The court evaluates the appropriateness and necessity of the nonminor's current placement based on evidence and documentation submitted under specific Welfare and Institutions Code sections. The form facilitates the court's findings and orders regarding the nonminor's living situation and future plans.
Who needs to be present at the hearing associated with the JV-462 form?
Several parties should be present at the hearing. This typically includes the nonminor dependent, their probation officer, and a social worker from the county agency. Additionally, a tribal representative may be present if applicable. Other individuals important to the nonminor, such as family members or supportive adults, may also attend to provide insight into the nonminor's situation.
What are the possible outcomes of the hearing when using the JV-462 form?
The court can determine various outcomes based on the evidence presented. These may include continuing the nonminor's placement, changing the placement, or finding that the current placement is no longer necessary. The court may also decide on a permanent plan for the nonminor, such as returning home, adoption, or another planned permanent living arrangement. Additionally, the court may order continued family reunification services or set a date for a follow-up hearing.
How does the JV-462 form address the nonminor's transition to independent living?
The JV-462 form includes sections that assess the nonminor's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan. It examines whether the plan includes adequate support services to help the nonminor transition to adulthood successfully. The form also evaluates the county agency's efforts to assist the nonminor in meeting the plan's goals, ensuring that the necessary resources and guidance are provided for a successful transition.
Filling out the California JV-462 form can be a straightforward process, but there are common pitfalls that people often encounter. One frequent mistake is neglecting to provide complete information in the attorney or party section. This includes omitting the State Bar number, which is crucial for identification purposes. Without this number, the court may not be able to properly process the form, leading to delays in the case.
Another common error is failing to accurately list all parties present at the hearing. It's essential to include names and roles, such as the nonminor dependent, probation officer, and county agency social worker. Incomplete information can create confusion and may result in procedural issues. Additionally, not specifying any tribal representatives or other individuals present can hinder the court's understanding of the case dynamics.
Many individuals also overlook the importance of evidence documentation. When the court requires reports from social workers or probation officers, these must be dated and included in the form. Missing this step can lead to the court disregarding vital information that could affect the outcome of the hearing.
Another mistake involves the Transitional Independent Living Case Plan. Some people fail to indicate whether the plan includes appropriate independent living skills. This section is critical as it helps outline the necessary services that will aid the nonminor in transitioning to adulthood. If this information is missing or unclear, it may lead to a lack of support for the youth.
Inaccuracies in the findings and orders section are also common. Individuals sometimes check boxes or provide information that contradicts earlier statements in the form. Consistency is key; any discrepancies can raise red flags for the court and complicate proceedings.
Moreover, some individuals forget to include the likely date for the nonminor's successful adulthood. This date is important for planning future hearings and ensuring that the nonminor receives the support they need in a timely manner. Failing to provide this information can lead to unnecessary delays in the case.
Finally, many people neglect to review the form thoroughly before submission. Simple typographical errors or omissions can lead to significant setbacks. Taking a moment to double-check all entries can save time and stress later on. Ensuring that every section is filled out accurately and completely is essential for a smooth process.
When navigating the complexities of juvenile dependency cases in California, several forms and documents often accompany the California JV 462 form. Each of these documents plays a crucial role in ensuring that the rights and needs of nonminor dependents are adequately addressed. Here’s a brief overview of some commonly used forms:
Each of these documents serves a unique purpose and contributes to the overall goal of protecting the welfare of nonminor dependents in California. Understanding their significance can help all parties involved navigate the juvenile court system more effectively.
The California JV-462 form is a critical document used in the juvenile court system, particularly concerning nonminor dependents. Several other forms share similarities with the JV-462, as they also address the needs and circumstances of youth in the foster care system. Below are four documents that are comparable to the JV-462 form, along with explanations of their similarities:
When filling out the California JV-462 form, it's important to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here are nine things you should and shouldn't do:
By following these guidelines, you can help ensure that your submission is clear and complete, which can facilitate a smoother process in court.
This form is specifically designed for nonminor dependents, typically those aged 18 or older, who are still under juvenile court jurisdiction. It addresses their unique needs and circumstances.
Even if a nonminor is thriving, the court must review their status regularly. The JV-462 form ensures that their continued placement and support are appropriate and necessary.
While the nonminor plays a crucial role, the county agency, social workers, and other parties must collaborate in completing the form and ensuring all relevant information is included.
The form must be supported by evidence and documentation, such as reports from social workers or probation officers. This information is critical for the court's decision-making process.
The form is part of an ongoing review process. Regular hearings and updates are essential to assess the nonminor's progress and needs over time.
While individuals can fill out the form themselves, seeking legal assistance is often beneficial. An attorney can help ensure that the form is completed accurately and that all necessary information is included.
The court carefully reviews each case. Approval is not guaranteed and depends on the evidence presented and the nonminor's specific circumstances.
While placement is a significant aspect, the form also addresses the nonminor's progress, support services, and overall readiness for independence.
Submitting the form is just one step in a larger process. Follow-up hearings and ongoing communication with the court and county agency are essential to ensure the nonminor's needs continue to be met.
Here are some key takeaways regarding the California JV-462 form: